Bellingham vs Endrick: 2025-26 Stats Comparison – Who Is Better Now?

In April 2026, Jude Bellingham remains the heartbeat of Real Madrid — but Endrick is making noise. The 19-year-old Brazilian has exploded this season with 20 goals across all competitions, sparking headlines and fan debates: has the next Galáctico already overtaken his more established teammate? While Endrick’s finishing and explosiveness dazzle, the numbers reveal a more complex picture.

• Bellingham has 24 goals and 15 assists in 42 appearances — a direct involvement in 0.93 goals per 90.
• Endrick has 20 goals and 5 assists in 28 games, but averages just 68 minutes per outing.
• Bellingham’s xG (13.8) and xA (10.9) show elite chance creation; Endrick’s xG is 16.4 — indicating overperformance.
• On progressive carries and shot-creating actions, Bellingham (5.2 and 4.1 per 90) doubles Endrick’s output.
• In high-pressure matches, Bellingham has scored in both Clásicos and a Champions League semi-final; Endrick’s impact has been off the bench.

Raw Numbers: Goals, Assists, and Minutes

At first glance, Endrick’s 20 goals seem to outshine Bellingham’s 24 — until context is added. The Brazilian has played 1,904 minutes this season, averaging 68 minutes per game. His goal every 95 minutes is sensational for a teenager, but his role remains rotational. Bellingham, by contrast, has played 3,486 minutes, anchoring Madrid’s attack as a false nine. His 15 assists — the most by a Madrid midfielder in a decade — highlight his all-round influence.

Even in pure finishing, Bellingham holds an edge in efficiency. His non-penalty goals per 90 (0.61) is slightly above Endrick’s (0.58), despite playing deeper. The Englishman also leads in shots on target (48% vs 41%), suggesting superior composure in the box.

Advanced Metrics: What xG, xA, and Progressive Play Reveal

Expected goals (xG) and expected assists (xA) paint a clear hierarchy. Bellingham’s xG of 13.8 and xA of 10.9 reflect not just volume, but quality of involvement. He’s consistently placed in dangerous zones, linking play and creating high-value chances. His 3.7 shot-creating actions per 90 trail only Kevin De Bruyne in Europe’s top five leagues.

Endrick, while clinical, has an xG of 16.4 — meaning he’s scored 3.6 goals above expectation. This is impressive, but analysts suggest it may not be sustainable. His shot-creating actions (1.9 per 90) and progressive carries (2.8) are solid for a young striker, but not elite. He thrives on through balls and counters, not build-up.

Experts believe Bellingham operates as a ‘system driver’, while Endrick is a ‘finisher’ — complementary roles, but not equal in influence.

Big Game Performance: Who Delivers Under Pressure?

In crunch moments, Bellingham has been Real Madrid’s go-to man. He scored in both Clásicos, notched a brace against Liverpool in the Champions League semi-final, and delivered a match-winning free-kick against Atlético in February. His composure in elimination football is now a hallmark.

Endrick, meanwhile, has scored important goals — including a 94th-minute winner against Sevilla — but primarily as a substitute. He’s yet to start a Champions League knockout match. His impact has been impactful, but not decisive in the biggest fixtures. Against Dortmund in the quarter-finals, he came on at 65 minutes after Bellingham had already broken the deadlock.

The Verdict: Bellingham Still Leads — But the Gap Is Closing

No, Endrick is not yet performing at Bellingham’s level in April 2026 — but he’s closing in faster than expected. The Brazilian’s finishing, movement, and potential are world-class. However, Bellingham’s leadership, consistency, and all-round game remain unmatched. He’s not just a scorer; he’s a conductor.

The Bellingham vs Endrick debate is less about who’s better today and more about what each represents: one is a finished, elite product; the other, a meteoric rise in progress. For now, Bellingham is the superior player. But by 2027-28, the answer could flip.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Who has better stats, Bellingham or Endrick?

A: Bellingham has superior all-round stats: 24 goals, 15 assists, higher xG, xA, and progressive play metrics. Endrick has more goals per minute, but plays fewer minutes and contributes less to chance creation.

Q: Is Endrick a future Ballon d'Or winner?

A: Yes, many experts believe so. At 19, his composure, finishing, and acceleration are already elite. If he secures a starting role and maintains his development curve, he could be a top-three contender by 2028.

Q: Who is the better player right now?

A: Jude Bellingham is clearly the better player in April 2026. He leads in influence, consistency, and big-game performance. Endrick is a rising star, but still a step behind in overall impact.